Cochrane · systematic review · CD009413

Horticultural therapy for schizophrenia

Liu, Y, Li, B, Sampson, SJ, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library

SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 57.1%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 42.9%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Horticultural therapy plus standard care compared with standard care alone for schizophrenia

Population: patients with schizophrenia
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Well‐being and quality of life Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI‐C) . Scale from: 0 to 77 (low = poor)
Horticultural therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Clinical global response
Horticultural therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
General functioning
Horticultural therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Physical fitness
Horticultural therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Satisfaction with treatment Leaving the study early
Horticultural therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone
RR 5 [0.27, 94.34]1 study · 24 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Adverse effect
Horticultural therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mental state and behaviour DASS21. Scale from: 0 to 84 (high = poor)
Horticultural therapy plus standard care vs standard care alone
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias