Cochrane · systematic review · CD009366

Lumbar sympathectomy versus prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia due to non‐reconstructable peripheral arterial disease

Sen, I, Agarwal, S, Tharyan, P, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

VascularAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 40%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 60%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Prostanoids versus lumbar sympathectomy for critical limb ischaemia due to non‐reconstructable peripheral arterial disease

Population: people with critical limb ischaemia due to non‐reconstructable peripheral arterial disease
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Complete ulcer healing without rest pain or major amputation (per protocol) Clinical assessment
Prostanoids vs lumbar sympathectomy
RR 1.63 [1.3, 2.05]1 study · 162 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Intermittent and absolute claudication distances
Prostanoids vs lumbar sympathectomy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life and functional status
Prostanoids vs lumbar sympathectomy
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects Clinical assessment
Prostanoids vs lumbar sympathectomy
no estimate extracted1 study · 162 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Mortality Clinical assessment
Prostanoids vs lumbar sympathectomy
no estimate extracted1 study · 162 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision