Cochrane · systematic review · CD009135

Rapid tests for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in patients with suspected disease

Boelaert, M, Verdonck, K, Menten, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library

Infectious DiseasesAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
9
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 33.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 6 · 66.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

rK39 immunochromatographic test for visceral leishmaniasis in the Indian subcontinent

Population: Patients suspected to have visceral leishmaniasis disease 1
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Peripheral health centre with a prior probability of disease of 40%
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1468 participantsHigh
Referral centre with a prior probability of disease of 60%
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1468 participantsHigh
CI: confidence interval
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

rK39 immunochromatographic test for visceral leishmaniasis in east Africa

Population: Patients suspected to have visceral leishmaniasis disease 1
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Peripheral health centre with a prior probability of disease of 40%
no estimate extracted9 studies · 1692 participantsHigh
Referral centre with a prior probability of disease of 60%
no estimate extracted9 studies · 1692 participantsHigh
CI: confidence interval
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Latex agglutination test in urine for the diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis

Population: Patients suspected to have visceral leishmaniasis disease 1
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Peripheral health centre with a prior probability of disease of 40%
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1374 participantsHigh
Referral centre with a prior probability of disease of 60%
no estimate extracted6 studies · 1374 participantsHigh
CI: confidence interval
no estimate extractedNRNo studies