Cochrane · systematic review · CD008879

Preoperative nutrition therapy in people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

Sowerbutts, AM, Burden, S, Sremanakova, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

Colorectal2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
16
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 6.3%Ungraded 4 · 25%Very low 6 · 37.5%Low 5 · 31.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Current version only

Preoperative parenteral nutrition compared to usual care or control in people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

Population: people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery
CD008879.PUB3 (current) · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Non‐infectious complications
Preoperative parenteral nutrition vs usual care or control
RR 0.61 [0.36, 1.02]3 studies · 260 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Infectious complications
Preoperative parenteral nutrition vs usual care or control
RR 0.98 [0.53, 1.8]3 studies · 260 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness
Length of hospital stay (days)
Preoperative parenteral nutrition vs usual care or control
no estimate extracted2 studies · 135 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Adverse effects
Preoperative parenteral nutrition vs usual care or control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 260 participantsUngraded

Preoperative enteral nutrition (standard formula) compared to usual care or control in people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

Population: people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery
CD008879.PUB3 (current) · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Non‐infectious complications
Preoperative enteral nutrition (standard formula) vs usual care or control
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Infectious complications
Preoperative enteral nutrition (standard formula) vs usual care or control
RR 0.9 [0.59, 1.38]2 studies · 126 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Length of hospital stay (days)
Preoperative enteral nutrition (standard formula) vs usual care or control
no estimate extracted2 studies · 126 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse effects
Preoperative enteral nutrition (standard formula) vs usual care or control
no estimate extracted1 study · 26 participantsUngraded

Immune‐enhancing supplements (oral or enteral) compared to usual care or control in people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

Population: people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery
CD008879.PUB3 (current) · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Non‐ infectious complications recorded up to 30 days postdischarge
Immune‐enhancing supplements (oral or enteral) vs usual care or control
RR 0.79 [0.62, 1]8 studies · 1020 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Infectious complications recorded up to 30 days postdischarge
Immune‐enhancing supplements (oral or enteral) vs usual care or control
RR 0.74 [0.53, 1.04]7 studies · 925 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Length of hospital stay (days)
Immune‐enhancing supplements (oral or enteral) vs usual care or control
no estimate extracted6 studies · 688 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Adverse effects
Immune‐enhancing supplements (oral or enteral) vs usual care or control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 399 participantsUngraded

Oral nutritional supplements compared to usual care or control in people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery

Population: people undergoing gastrointestinal surgery
CD008879.PUB3 (current) · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Non‐infectious complications recorded up to 30 days postdischarge
Oral nutritional supplements vs usual care or control
RR 0.9 [0.67, 1.2]5 studies · 473 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Infectious complications recorded up to 30 days postdischarge
Oral nutritional supplements vs usual care or control
RR 0.88 [0.6, 1.27]5 studies · 473 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Length of hospital stay (days)
Oral nutritional supplements vs usual care or control
no estimate extracted3 studies · 299 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse effects
Oral nutritional supplements vs usual care or control
no estimate extracted4 studies · 373 participantsUngraded

Comparison

Population: preoperative patients undergoing GI surgery
CD008879.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total complications
RR 0.67548 participantsModerate
Infectious complications
RR 0.51488 participantsModerate
length of stay number of days
no estimate extracted549 participantsModerate

Comparison

Population: Patients undergoing GI surgery
CD008879.PUB2 · 3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total complications
RR 1.17 [0.54, 2.55]263 participantsModerate
Infectious complications
RR 1.09 [0.83, 1.42]250 participantsModerate
length of hospital stay
no estimate extracted206 participantsModerate

Comparison

Population: GI surgical patients
CD008879.PUB2 · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Total complications
RR 0.64 [0.46, 0.87]260 participantsLow
Infectious complications
RR 0.94 [0.8, 1.1]226 participantsLow

Comparison

Population: preoperative GI patients
CD008879.PUB2 · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
total complications
no estimate extracted120 participantsLow
Infectious complications
no estimate extracted120 participantsLow