Cochrane · systematic review · CD008785

Interventions based on the Theory of Mind cognitive model for autism spectrum disorder (ASD)

Fletcher‐Watson, S, McConnell, F, Manola, E, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 75%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Comparison

Population: People with autism spectrum disorder
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Symptom Level: Communication Various measures, including: Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Conversation Skills Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) (level of eye‐contact)
no estimate extracted17 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Symptom Level: Social Interaction Various measures, including: Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Communication and Symbolic Behaviour Scale (CSBS) Early Social Communication Scales (ESCS) PDD‐BI social approach subscale Precursors of J...
no estimate extracted17 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
General Communication Ability (e.g. vocabulary) Mullen Scales of Early Learning (MSEL) Reynell Developmental Language Scales
no estimate extracted71 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Theory of Mind ability Various measures, including: False‐belief tasks Happe's Strange Stories Faux‐Pas Recognition Test NEPSY‐II ToM tasks The ToM Test
no estimate extracted27 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency