Cochrane · systematic review · CD008651

Stavudine or zidovudine in three‐drug combination therapy for initial treatment of HIV infection in antiretroviral‐naïve individuals

Spaulding, A, Rutherford, GW, Siegfried, N · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2010 · Cochrane Library

HIV/AIDSAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 28.6%Low 5 · 71.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

d4T compared to AZT for initial treatment of HIV infection in antiretroviral‐naive individuals

Population: patients with initial treatment of HIV infection in antiretroviral‐naive individuals
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
d4T vs AZT
RR 1.36 [0.34, 5.42]6 studies · 1179 participantsVery low
Downgraded: indirectness
Clinical progression
d4T vs AZT
RR 0.78 [0.28, 2.13]7 studies · 719 participantsLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Severe adverse events
d4T vs AZT
RR 1.17 [0.97, 1.4]9 studies · 1363 participantsLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Virologic response
d4T vs AZT
RR 1.03 [0.88, 1.19]12 studies · 2157 participantsLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Adherence/tolerability/retention
d4T vs AZT
RR 0.94 [0.84, 1.05]12 studies · 2157 participantsLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Immunologic response
d4T vs AZT
no estimate extracted10 studies · 1537 participantsLow
Downgraded: indirectness
Drug resistance
d4T vs AZT
RR 0.66 [0.25, 1.73]1 study · 174 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness