Cochrane · systematic review · CD008532

Combination inhaled steroid and long‐acting beta₂‐agonist in addition to tiotropium versus tiotropium or combination alone for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Rojas‐Reyes, MX, García Morales, OM, Dennis, RJ, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

Airways2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 57.1%Moderate 3 · 42.9%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Current version only

Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination compared with tiotropium for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Population: patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
CD008532.PUB3 (current) · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality (all‐cause)
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination vs tiotropium
OR 1.8 [0.55, 5.91]2 studies · 961 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Hospital admission (all causes)
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination vs tiotropium
OR 0.84 [0.53, 1.33]2 studies · 961 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Exacerbation ‐ at 12‐month
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination vs tiotropium
OR 0.89 [0.56, 1.41]1 study · 301 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Serious adverse events (non‐fatal)
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination vs tiotropium
OR 0.86 [0.57, 1.3]4 studies · 1758 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life up to 6 months (SGRQ)
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination vs tiotropium
no estimate extracted4 studies · 4 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1 pre‐dose ‐ FEV1 3‐6 months mean difference
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination vs tiotropium
no estimate extracted4 studies · 4 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1 pre‐dose ‐ FEV1 1 year
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination vs tiotropium
no estimate extracted1 study · 1 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Tiotropium plus LABA/ICS combination compared to Tiotropium plus placebo for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Population: patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
CD008532.PUB2 · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality (all cause)
Tiotropium plus LABA/ICS combination vs Tiotropium plus placebo
OR 1.88 [0.57, 6.23]2 studies · 1021 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Hospital admission (all causes)
Tiotropium plus LABA/ICS combination vs Tiotropium plus placebo
OR 0.84 [0.53, 1.33]2 studies · 961 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Hospital admission (exacerbation)
Tiotropium plus LABA/ICS combination vs Tiotropium plus placebo
OR 0.66 [0.39, 1.13]2 studies · 961 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Exacerbation
Tiotropium plus LABA/ICS combination vs Tiotropium plus placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 961 participantsUngraded
Pneumonia
Tiotropium plus LABA/ICS combination vs Tiotropium plus placebo
OR 1.35 [0.31, 5.99]2 studies · 961 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life SGRQ scale ‐ Quality of life 3‐5 months mean difference + 1 yr SE
Tiotropium plus LABA/ICS combination vs Tiotropium plus placebo
no estimate extracted2 studies · 961 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision