Cochrane · systematic review · CD008446
Omentoplasty for oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Yuan, Y, Zeng, X, Hu, Y, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 5 · 83.3%High 1 · 16.7%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Current version onlyOmentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy versus oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
Population: patients with oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Mortality Clinical manifestation Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy | RR 1.28 [0.49, 3.39] | 3 studies · 633 participants | High |
Anastomotic leakage Radiographic contrast study and/or clinical manifestation Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy | RR 0.25 [0.11, 0.55] | 3 studies · 633 participants | Moderate |
Anastomotic leakage—TTE Radiographic contrast study Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy | RR 0.19 [0.03, 1.03] | 2 studies · 272 participants | Moderate |
Anastomotic leakage—THE Radiographic contrast study Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy | RR 0.23 [0.07, 0.79] | 2 studies · 177 participants | Moderate |
Anastomotic leakage—3‐field oesophagectomy Radiographic contrast study and/or clinical manifestation Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy | RR 0.33 [0.09, 1.19] | 1 study · 184 participants | Moderate |
Anastomotic strictures Barium swallow and/ or endoscope examinationd Omentoplasty with oesophagogastrostomy vs oesophagogastrostomy after oesophagectomy | RR 0.91 [0.33, 2.57] | 3 studies · 631 participants | Moderate |
Omentoplasty + esophagogastrostomy versus esophagogastrostomy for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy
Population: patients with esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Mortality Clinical manifestation Omentoplasty + esophagogastrostomy vs esophagogastrostomy | RR 1 [0.25, 3.92] | 2 studies · 449 participants | High |
Anastomotic leakage radiographic contrast study Omentoplasty + esophagogastrostomy vs esophagogastrostomy | RR 0.22 [0.08, 0.58] | 2 studies · 449 participants | Moderate |
Anastomotic leakage ‐ TTE radiographic contrast study Omentoplasty + esophagogastrostomy vs esophagogastrostomy | RR 0.19 [0.03, 1.03] | 2 studies · 272 participants | Moderate |
Anastomotic leakage ‐ THE radiographic contrast study Omentoplasty + esophagogastrostomy vs esophagogastrostomy | RR 0.23 [0.07, 0.79] | 2 studies · 177 participants | Moderate |
Anastomotic strictures Barium swallow and endoscope exam4 Omentoplasty + esophagogastrostomy vs esophagogastrostomy | RR 0.73 [0.21, 2.58] | 2 studies · 447 participants | Moderate |