Cochrane · systematic review · CD008211
Transparent Cap Colonoscopy versus Standard Colonoscopy to Improve Caecal Intubation
Morgan, J, Thomas, K, Lee‐Robichaud, H, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library
ColorectalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
1
current version
GRADE rated
1
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 100%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Caecal Intubation Rate for
Population: patients with
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Total Successful Intubation Rate | OR 1.36 [0.95, 1.93] | 12 studies · 5932 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |