Cochrane · systematic review · CD007830
Treadmill training for patients with Parkinson's disease
Mehrholz, J, Kugler, J, Storch, A, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 16.7%Very low 1 · 16.7%Low 2 · 33.3%Moderate 2 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Current version onlyTreadmill training versus no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training for patients with Parkinson's disease
Population: patients with patients with Parkinson's disease
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Gait speed at the end of the study ‐ Active control group (co‐interventions were similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 14 studies · 434 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Gait speed at the end of the study ‐ No interventioncontrol group (co‐interventions were not similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 76 participants | Very low Downgraded: publication bias |
walking distance in m (at the end of study; all studies) ‐ Active control group (co‐interventions were similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 385 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
walking distance in m (at the end of study; all studies) ‐ No intervention control group (co‐interventions were not similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 31 participants | Ungraded |
acceptability and safety of treadmill training ‐ Active control group (co‐interventions were similar in both groups) Number of adverse events and drop‐outs Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 15 studies · 531 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
acceptability and safety of treadmill training ‐ No intervention control group (co‐interventions were not similar in both groups) Number of adverse events and drop‐outs Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 102 participants | Low Downgraded: inconsistency, publication bias |
Treadmill training versus no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training for patients with Parkinson's disease
Population: patients with patients with Parkinson's disease
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Gait speed at the end of the study ‐ Active control group (co‐interventions were similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 14 studies · 434 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Gait speed at the end of the study ‐ No interventioncontrol group (co‐interventions were not similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 76 participants | Very low Downgraded: publication bias |
walking distance in m (at the end of study; all studies) ‐ Active control group (co‐interventions were similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 9 studies · 385 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
walking distance in m (at the end of study; all studies) ‐ No intervention control group (co‐interventions were not similar in both groups) Measures of timed gait. Scale from: 0 to inf. Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 31 participants | Ungraded |
acceptability and safety of treadmill training ‐ Active control group (co‐interventions were similar in both groups) Number of adverse events and drop‐outs Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 15 studies · 531 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
acceptability and safety of treadmill training ‐ No intervention control group (co‐interventions were not similar in both groups) Number of adverse events and drop‐outs Treadmill training vs no treadmill training or active control intervention or gait training | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 102 participants | Low Downgraded: inconsistency, publication bias |