Cochrane · systematic review · CD007639

Nebuliser systems for drug delivery in cystic fibrosis

Stanford, G, Morrison, L, Brown, C · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
98
current version
GRADE rated
42
No studies
56
Included studies
NR
No studies 56 · 57.1%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 35 · 35.7%Low 7 · 7.1%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems compared

Population: children and adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time: time for a single nebulised treatment (min)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 88 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Quality of life
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition: Cmax (µg/mL)
no estimate extracted1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Adverse events: bronchoconstriction
no estimate extracted20 studies · 78 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
FEV1: change in FEV1 % predicted
no estimate extracted1 study · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Time to next exacerbation
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
RR 2.33 [0.83, 6.54]101 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems compared to VMT

Population: children and adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time: mean treatment time (min)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT
no estimate extracted4 studies · 103 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax (µg/mL)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT
no estimate extracted5 studies · 126 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT
RR 0.78 [0.37, 1.64]2 studies · 60 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1:change in FEV1 % predicted
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT
no estimate extracted1 study · 49 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems compared to VMT and AAD

Population: children aged 6 ‐ 18 with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time nebulisation time (min)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT and AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT and AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax (µg/mL)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT and AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT and AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
FEV1 Change in FEV1 % predicted
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT and AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT and AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference Satisfaction scale
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs VMT and AAD
MD 2.7 [1.35, 4.05]1 study · 22 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems compared to AAD

Population: children and adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time (min)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition: Cmax (mg/L)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) compared to VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)

Population: people with cystic fibrosis (age not given)
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time (min)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
FEV1
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering tobramycin: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin: conventional systems compared to AAD

Population: children and adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time (seconds)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition (Cmax)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
FEV1 change from baseline
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 259 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Participant satisfaction or preference
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin: conventional systems vs AAD
RR 0.45 [0.35, 0.57]1 study · 259 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin and dornase alfa: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) compared to VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)

Population: children with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time (minutes)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin and dornase alfa: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin and dornase alfa: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin and dornase alfa: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin and dornase alfa: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
FEV1
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin and dornase alfa: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin and dornase alfa: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering colistin and dornase alfa: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa: conventional systems compared

Population: children and adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time (minutes)
no estimate extracted3 studies · 932 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
no estimate extracted2 studies · 922 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1146 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to next exacerbation
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa conventional system compared to AAD

Population: children with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa conventional system vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa conventional system vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa conventional system vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa conventional system vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
FEV1
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa conventional system vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa conventional system vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa conventional system vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa: conventional system compared to VMT

Population: children and adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time (minutes)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa: conventional system vs VMT
no estimate extracted1 study · 85 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Quality of life CFQ‐R scores (treatment burden domain and respiratory domain)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa: conventional system vs VMT
no estimate extracted1 study · 85 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Serum deposition Cmax
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa: conventional system vs VMT
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa: conventional system vs VMT
no estimate extracted1 study · 85 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
FEV1 FEV1 % predicted
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa: conventional system vs VMT
no estimate extracted1 study · 85 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa: conventional system vs VMT
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference:
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering dornase alfa: conventional system vs VMT
RR 0.48 [0.31, 0.76]1 study · 68 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems compared

Population: adults and children with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
FEV1
no estimate extracted1 study · 12 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Time to next exacerbation
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems compared to AAD

Population: adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 6 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
FEV1 change from baseline
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extracted1 study · 6 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs AAD
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) compared to VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)

Population: adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time (minutes)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extracted1 study · 13 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
FEV1
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: VMT and AAD tidal breathing mode (TBM) vs VMT and AAD target inhalation mode (TIM)
no estimate extracted1 study · 15 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems compared to ultrasonic nebulisers

Population: children and adults with cystic fibrosis
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Treatment time (min)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs ultrasonic nebulisers
no estimate extracted2 studies · 8 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of life
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs ultrasonic nebulisers
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Serum deposition Cmax
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs ultrasonic nebulisers
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs ultrasonic nebulisers
no estimate extracted1 study · 8 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
FEV1 (L)
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs ultrasonic nebulisers
no estimate extracted1 study · 8 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Time to next exacerbation
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs ultrasonic nebulisers
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction or preference
Summary of findings ‐ nebulisers for delivering other aerosolised medications: conventional systems vs ultrasonic nebulisers
no estimate extracted1 study · 8 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness