Cochrane · systematic review · CD007560

Methotrexate for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

Wang, Y, MacDonald, JK, Vandermeer, B, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

GutAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 75%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Methotrexate compared to placebo for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

Population: patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Maintenance of remission
Methotrexate vs placebo
RR 0.64 [0.28, 1.45]1 study · 32 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Methotrexate compared to 5‐ASA for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

Population: patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Maintenance of remission
Methotrexate vs 5‐ASA
RR 1.12 [0.06, 20.71]1 study · 9 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Methotrexate compared to 6‐MP for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis

Population: patients with maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Maintenance of Remission
Methotrexate vs 6‐MP
RR 0.22 [0.03, 1.45]1 study · 18 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Methotrexate + sulfasalazine compared to sulfasalazine

Population: patients with maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis
1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Maintenance of Remission
Methotrexate + sulfasalazine vs sulfasalazine
RR 1.32 [0.94, 1.86]1 study · 26 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision