Cochrane · systematic review · CD007478

Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

Hannon, CW, McCourt, C, Lima, HC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

SkinAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
42
current version
GRADE rated
19
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 23 · 54.8%Very low 0 · 0%Low 10 · 23.8%Moderate 9 · 21.4%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Oral methotrexate versus placebo for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

Population: patients with cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Primary outcome: complete clinical response (malar/discoid rash)
Oral methotrexate vs placebo
RR 3.57 [1.63, 7.84]1 study · 41 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Primary outcome: partial clinical response
Oral methotrexate vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: clinical flare
Oral methotrexate vs placebo
RR 0.77 [0.32, 1.83]1 study · 86 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Secondary outcome: CLASI
Oral methotrexate vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: Dermatology quality of life measure
Oral methotrexate vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Adverse events: severe
Oral methotrexate vs placebo
RR 12.05 [0.69, 211.36]1 study · 86 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Adverse events: minor
Oral methotrexate vs placebo
RR 0.68 [0.39, 1.17]1 study · 86 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Oral hydroxychloroquine versus placebo for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

Population: patients with cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Primary outcome: complete clinical response
Oral hydroxychloroquine vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Primary outcome: partial clinical response
Oral hydroxychloroquine vs placebo
RR 7 [0.41, 120.16]1 study · 20 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Secondary outcome: clinical flare
Oral hydroxychloroquine vs placebo
RR 0.49 [0.28, 0.89]1 study · 47 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Secondary outcome: CLASI
Oral hydroxychloroquine vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: Dermatology Quality of Life measure
Oral hydroxychloroquine vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Adverse events: severe
Oral hydroxychloroquine vs placebo
RR 3.9 [0.19, 78.46]1 study · 71 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events: minor
Oral hydroxychloroquine vs placebo
RR 1.32 [0.24, 7.19]1 study · 47 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Oral dehydroepiandrosterone versus placebo for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

Population: patients with cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Primary outcome: complete clinical response
Oral dehydroepiandrosterone vs placebo
RR 1.11 [1, 1.22]1 study · 381 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Primary outcome: partial clinical response
Oral dehydroepiandrosterone vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: clinical flare
Oral dehydroepiandrosterone vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: CLASI
Oral dehydroepiandrosterone vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: Dermatology Quality of Life measure
Oral dehydroepiandrosterone vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Adverse events: severe
Oral dehydroepiandrosterone vs placebo
RR 0.09 [0.01, 1.66]1 study · 381 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events: minor
Oral dehydroepiandrosterone vs placebo
RR 10.5 [3.26, 33.75]1 study · 381 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Oral chloroquine versus placebo for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

Population: patients with cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Primary outcome: complete clinical response
Oral chloroquine vs placebo
RR 1.57 [0.95, 2.61]1 study · 24 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Primary outcome: partial clinical response
Oral chloroquine vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: clinical flare
Oral chloroquine vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: CLASI
Oral chloroquine vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: Dermatology Quality of Life measure
Oral chloroquine vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Adverse events: severe
Oral chloroquine vs placebo
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.45]1 study · 24 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events: minor
Oral chloroquine vs placebo
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded

Oral ciclosporin versus oral azathioprine for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

Population: patients with cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Primary outcome: complete clinical response
Oral ciclosporin vs oral azathioprine
RR 0.83 [0.46, 1.52]1 study · 89 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Primary outcome: partial clinical response
Oral ciclosporin vs oral azathioprine
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: clinical flare
Oral ciclosporin vs oral azathioprine
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: CLASI
Oral ciclosporin vs oral azathioprine
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: Dermatology Quality of Life measure
Oral ciclosporin vs oral azathioprine
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Adverse events: severe
Oral ciclosporin vs oral azathioprine
RR 0.89 [0.48, 1.65]1 study · 89 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Adverse events: minor (hirsutism)
Oral ciclosporin vs oral azathioprine
RR 9.83 [1.32, 72.95]1 study · 89 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias

Oral methotrexate versus oral chloroquine for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus

Population: patients with cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Primary outcome: complete clinical response
Oral methotrexate vs oral chloroquine
RR 1.13 [0.84, 1.5]1 study · 25 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Primary outcome: partial clinical response
Oral methotrexate vs oral chloroquine
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: clinical flare
Oral methotrexate vs oral chloroquine
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: Dermatology Quality of Life measure
Oral methotrexate vs oral chloroquine
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Secondary outcome: CLASI
Oral methotrexate vs oral chloroquine
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Adverse events: severe
Oral methotrexate vs oral chloroquine
RR 1.73 [0.27, 11.07]1 study · 41 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events: minor
Oral methotrexate vs oral chloroquine
RR 3.9 [1.45, 10.51]1 study · 41 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision