Cochrane · systematic review · CD007222

Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on different risk profiles and settings for improving maternal and infant health

Tieu, J, McPhee, AJ, Crowther, CA, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Pregnancy and ChildbirthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
29
current version
GRADE rated
9
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 20 · 69%Very low 2 · 6.9%Low 7 · 24.1%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Universal screening versus risk‐factor screening for gestational diabetes for improving maternal health

Population: pregnant women, excluding women already diagnosed with GDM in this pregnancy and those with pre‐existing diabetes mellitus
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gestational diabetes mellitus
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
RR 1.85 [1.12, 3.04]1 study · 3152 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Caesarean birth
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Perineal trauma
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Gestational weight gain
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Postnatal depression
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded

Universal screening versus risk‐factor screening for gestational diabetes for improving infant health

Population: pregnant women, excluding women already diagnosed with GDM in this pregnancy and those with pre‐existing diabetes mellitus
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Large‐for‐gestational age
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Perinatal mortality
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Mortality or morbidity composite
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Hypoglycaemia
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Childhood/adulthood adiposity
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Childhood/adulthood type 2 diabetes mellitus
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Childhood/adulthood neurosensory disability
Universal screening vs risk‐factor screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded

Primary care screening versus secondary care screening for gestational diabetes for improving maternal health

Population: pregnant women, excluding women already diagnosed with GDM in this pregnancy and those with pre‐existing diabetes mellitus
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Gestational diabetes mellitus
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
RR 0.91 [0.5, 1.66]1 study · 690 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: hypertension
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
RR 1.41 [0.77, 2.59]1 study · 690 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: pre‐eclampsia toxemia
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
RR 0.8 [0.36, 1.78]1 study · 690 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Caesarean birth
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
RR 1 [0.8, 1.27]1 study · 690 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Perineal trauma
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Gestational weight gain
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Postnatal depression
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded

Primary care screening versus secondary care screening for gestational diabetes for improving infant health

Population: pregnant women, excluding women already diagnosed with GDM in this pregnancy and those with pre‐existing diabetes mellitus
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Large‐for‐gestational age
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
RR 1.37 [0.96, 1.96]1 study · 690 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Perinatal mortality
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
RR 1.1 [0.1, 12.12]1 study · 690 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Neonatal mortality or morbidity composite: neonatal complications
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
RR 0.99 [0.57, 1.71]1 study · 690 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Hypoglycaemia
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
RR 1.1 [0.28, 4.38]1 study · 690 participantsVery low
Downgraded: imprecision
Childhood/adulthood adiposity
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Childhood/adulthood type 2 diabetes mellitus
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Childhood/adulthood neurosensory disability
Primary care screening vs secondary care screening
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded