Cochrane · systematic review · CD006908

Music interventions for preoperative anxiety

Bradt, J, Dileo, C, Shim, M · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library

AnaesthesiaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 5 · 71.4%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Music interventions versus standard care for preoperative anxiety

Population: patients with preoperative anxiety
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Preoperative anxiety (STAI) STAI. Scale from: 20 to 80.
Music interventions vs standard care
no estimate extracted13 studies · 896 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Preoperative anxiety (non‐STAI) VAS, NRS
Music interventions vs standard care
no estimate extracted7 studies · 504 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Heart rate
Music interventions vs standard care
no estimate extracted16 studies · 1109 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Heart rate variability LF/HF ratio
Music interventions vs standard care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 241 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Systolic blood pressure
Music interventions vs standard care
no estimate extracted14 studies · 809 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Diastolic blood pressure
Music interventions vs standard care
no estimate extracted13 studies · 786 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Respiratory rate
Music interventions vs standard care
no estimate extracted6 studies · 375 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency