Cochrane · systematic review · CD006649

Anticoagulation for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in people with cancer

Kahale, LA, Matar, CF, Hakoum, MB, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer7 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
24
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
14
Included studies
NR
No studies 14 · 58.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 9 · 37.5%Moderate 1 · 4.2%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Current version only

Low molecular weight heparin compared to unfractionated heparin

Population: people with cancer with venous thromboembolism (VTE)
CD006649.PUB8 (current) · 8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcomes
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mortality
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
RR 0.66 [0.4, 1.1]5 studies · 418 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Recurrent VTE
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
RR 0.69 [0.27, 1.76]3 studies · 422 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Major bleeding ‐ not reported
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Minor bleeding ‐ not reported
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Postphlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Fondaparinux compared to heparin

Population: people with cancer with VTE
CD006649.PUB8 (current) · 8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcomes
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mortality
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.25 [0.86, 1.81]1 study · 477 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Recurrent VTE
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.93 [0.56, 1.54]1 study · 477 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Major bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.82 [0.4, 1.66]1 study · 477 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Minor bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.53 [0.88, 2.66]1 study · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Postphlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Dalteparin compared to tinzaparin

Population: initial treatment in people with cancer with VTE
CD006649.PUB8 (current) · 8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcomes
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mortality
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
RR 0.86 [0.43, 1.73]1 study · 113 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Recurrent VTE
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
RR 0.44 [0.09, 2.16]1 study · 113 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Major bleeding
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
RR 2.19 [0.2, 23.42]1 study · 113 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Minor bleeding
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
RR 0.82 [0.3, 2.21]1 study · 113 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Postphlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

LMWH initial treatment compared to UFH initial treatment in people with cancer with VTE

CD006649.PUB7 · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
LMWH initial treatment vs UFH initial treatment
RR 0.66 [0.4, 1.1]5 studies · 418 participantsModerate
Recurrent VTE
LMWH initial treatment vs UFH initial treatment
RR 0.69 [0.27, 1.76]3 studies · 422 participantsModerate

Fondaparinux initial treatment compared to Heparin initial treatment in patients with cancer with VTE

CD006649.PUB7 · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
Fondaparinux initial treatment vs Heparin initial treatment
RR 1.25 [0.86, 1.81]1 study · 477 participantsModerate
Recurrent VTE
Fondaparinux initial treatment vs Heparin initial treatment
RR 0.93 [0.56, 1.54]1 study · 477 participantsModerate
Major bleeding
Fondaparinux initial treatment vs Heparin initial treatment
RR 0.82 [0.4, 1.66]1 study · 477 participantsModerate
Minor bleeding
Fondaparinux initial treatment vs Heparin initial treatment
RR 1.53 [0.88, 2.66]1 study · 477 participantsModerate
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux initial treatment vs Heparin initial treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Dalteparin compared to tinzaparin in people with cancer with VTE

CD006649.PUB7 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
RR 0.86 [0.43, 1.73]1 study · 113 participantsLow
Recurrent VTE
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
RR 0.44 [0.09, 2.16]1 study · 113 participantsLow
Major bleeding
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
RR 2.19 [0.2, 23.42]1 study · 113 participantsLow
Minor bleeding
Dalteparin vs tinzaparin
RR 0.82 [0.3, 2.21]1 study · 113 participantsLow

Low molecular weight heparin compared with unfractionated heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Population: patients with cancer with the initial treatment of VTE
CD006649.PUB6 · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality at 3 months
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
RR 0.71 [0.52, 0.98]11 studies · 801 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Recurrent VTE
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
RR 0.78 [0.29, 2.08]3 studies · 371 participantsLow
Major bleeding ‐ not reported
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Postphlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
Low molecular weight heparin vs unfractionated heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Fondaparinux compared with heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Population: patients with cancer with the initial treatment of VTE
CD006649.PUB6 · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.27 [0.88, 1.84]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Recurrent VTE
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.95 [0.57, 1.6]2 studies · 477 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Major bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.79 [0.39, 1.63]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Minor bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.5 [0.87, 2.59]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Postphlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

LMWH compared to UFH for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Population: patients with the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
CD006649.PUB5 · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death at 3 months
LMWH vs UFH
RR 0.71 [0.52, 0.98]11 studies · 801 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Recurrent VTE
LMWH vs UFH
RR 0.78 [0.29, 2.08]3 studies · 371 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Major bleeding ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Post phlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Fondaparinux compared to heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Population: patients with the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
CD006649.PUB5 · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.27 [0.88, 1.84]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Recurrent VTE
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.95 [0.57, 1.6]2 studies · 477 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Major bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.79 [0.39, 1.63]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Minor bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.5 [0.87, 2.59]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Post phlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

LMWH compared to UFH for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Population: patients with the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
CD006649.PUB4 · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death at 3 months
LMWH vs UFH
RR 0.71 [0.52, 0.98]11 studies · 801 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Recurrent VTE
LMWH vs UFH
RR 0.78 [0.29, 2.08]3 studies · 371 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Major bleeding ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Post phlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Fondaparinux compared to heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Population: patients with the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
CD006649.PUB4 · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.27 [0.88, 1.84]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Recurrent VTE
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.95 [0.57, 1.6]2 studies · 477 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Major bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.79 [0.39, 1.63]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Minor bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.5 [0.87, 2.59]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Post phlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

LMWH compared to UFH for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Population: patients with the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
CD006649.PUB3 · 6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death at 3 months
LMWH vs UFH
RR 0.71 [0.52, 0.98]11 studies · 801 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias
Recurrent VTE
LMWH vs UFH
RR 0.78 [0.29, 2.08]3 studies · 371 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Major bleeding ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Post phlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
LMWH vs UFH
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Fondaparinux compared to heparin for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer

Population: patients with the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer
CD006649.PUB3 · 7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.27 [0.88, 1.84]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Recurrent VTE
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.95 [0.57, 1.6]2 studies · 477 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Major bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 0.79 [0.39, 1.63]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Minor bleeding
Fondaparinux vs heparin
RR 1.5 [0.87, 2.59]2 studies · 477 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Post phlebitic syndrome ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Quality of life ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Thrombocytopenia ‐ not reported
Fondaparinux vs heparin
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Comparison

Population: patients with cancer requiring initial anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism
CD006649.PUB2 · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death (
RR 0.71 [0.51, 0.97]11 studies · 801 participantsModerate
Downgraded: publication bias
Recurrent venous thromboembolism (
RR 0.78 [0.29, 2.08]3 studies · 371 participantsLow
Downgraded: publication bias