Cochrane · systematic review · CD006574
Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Gurusamy, KS, Koti, R, Davidson, BR · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 7 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Current version onlyAbdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Population: patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious adverse events | Rate ratio 1 [0.17, 5.77] | 2 studies · 58 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Operating time | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 107 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Population: patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious adverse events (number of serious adverse events) | Rate ratio 1.73 [0.35, 8.61] | 3 studies · 198 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Serious adverse events (proportion of patients with serious adverse events) | RR 2.01 [0.52, 7.8] | 6 studies · 343 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Conversion to open cholecystectomy | RR 0.76 [0.26, 2.21] | 11 studies · 460 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Operating time | no estimate extracted | 16 studies · 649 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Proportion discharged as day‐patient laparoscopic cholecystectomy | RR 1.67 [0.85, 3.26] | 2 studies · 62 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Population: patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious adverse events | Rate ratio 1 [0.17, 5.77] | 2 studies · 58 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Operating time | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 107 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Abdominal lift for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Population: patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Serious adverse events (number of serious adverse events) | Rate ratio 1.73 [0.35, 8.61] | 6 studies · 343 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Serious adverse events (proportion of patients with serious adverse events) | RR 2.01 [0.52, 7.8] | 6 studies · 343 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Conversion to open cholecystectomy | RR 0.76 [0.26, 2.21] | 11 studies · 460 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |
Operating time | no estimate extracted | 16 studies · 649 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency |
Proportion discharged as day‐patient laparoscopic cholecystectomy | RR 1.67 [0.85, 3.26] | 2 studies · 62 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, publication bias |