Cochrane · systematic review · CD005992
Legislative smoking bans for reducing harms from secondhand smoke exposure, smoking prevalence and tobacco consumption
Frazer, K, Callinan, JE, McHugh, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library
Tobacco AddictionAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 50%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 1 · 25%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: Smokers and nonsmokers
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Cardiovascular health | no estimate extracted | NR | Moderate Downgraded: imprecision |
Respiratory health | no estimate extracted | NR | Very low Downgraded: imprecision |
Perinatal health | no estimate extracted | NR | Very low Downgraded: imprecision |
Mortality | no estimate extracted | NR | Low Downgraded: imprecision |