Cochrane · systematic review · CD005487

Infraclavicular brachial plexus block for regional anaesthesia of the lower arm

Chin, KJ, Alakkad, H, Adhikary, SD, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library

Anaesthesia2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 2 · 33.3%High 4 · 66.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

infraclavicular block versus all other brachial plexus blocks for regional anaesthesia of the lower arm

Population: patients with regional anaesthesia of the lower arm
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adequate surgical anaesthesia ‐ At 30 minutes post‐block assessment interval
infraclavicular block vs all other brachial plexus blocks
RR 0.88 [0.51, 1.52]14 studies · 1051 participantsHigh
Supplementation required to achieve adequate surgical anaesthesia
infraclavicular block vs all other brachial plexus blocks
RR 0.95 [0.62, 1.46]17 studies · 1412 participantsHigh
Tourniquet pain
infraclavicular block vs all other brachial plexus blocks
RR 0.66 [0.47, 0.92]8 studies · 615 participantsHigh
Onset time of adequate surgical anaesthesia (minutes)
infraclavicular block vs all other brachial plexus blocks
no estimate extracted9 studies · 726 participantsModerate
Block performance time (minutes) ‐ multiple‐injection axillary block
infraclavicular block vs all other brachial plexus blocks
no estimate extracted6 studies · 391 participantsHigh
Block performance time (minutes) ‐ mid‐humeral block
infraclavicular block vs all other brachial plexus blocks
no estimate extracted2 studies · 224 participantsModerate