Cochrane · systematic review · CD004876

Vaccines for preventing influenza in the elderly

Demicheli, V, Jefferson, T, Di Pietrantonj, C, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2018 · Cochrane Library

Acute Respiratory InfectionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 14.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 28.6%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 2 · 28.6%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Influenza vaccine compared to placebo for preventing influenza in the elderly

Population: people aged over 65 years
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Influenza
Influenza vaccine vs placebo
RR 0.42 [0.27, 0.66]3 studies · 2217 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Influenza‐like illness
Influenza vaccine vs placebo
RR 0.59 [0.47, 0.73]4 studies · 6894 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Pneumonia
Influenza vaccine vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 699 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Hospitalisations ‐ not reported
Influenza vaccine vs placebo
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
All deaths
Influenza vaccine vs placebo
RR 1.02 [0.11, 9.72]1 study · 699 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Fever
Influenza vaccine vs placebo
RR 1.57 [0.92, 2.71]3 studies · 2519 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Nausea
Influenza vaccine vs placebo
RR 1.75 [0.74, 4.12]1 study · 672 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision