Cochrane · systematic review · CD004462

Interventions for treating urinary incontinence after stroke in adults

Thomas, LH, Coupe, J, Cross, LD, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

IncontinenceAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
24
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
18
Included studies
NR
No studies 18 · 75%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 16.7%Moderate 2 · 8.3%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Behavioural interventions compared with usual care or no treatment for treating urinary incontinence after stroke

Population: people with stroke and urinary incontinence
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants continent after treatment
Behavioural interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Number of incontinent episodes
Behavioural interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Perception of improvement or cure
Behavioural interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health status and quality of life assessed by Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Questionnaire (quality of life items, score range 0, best case, to 18, worst case); mean total score Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (each subscale score r...
Behavioural interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 55 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Functional ability
Behavioural interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Behavioural interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Specialised professional input interventions compared with usual care or no treatment for treating urinary incontinence after stroke

Population: people with stroke and urinary incontinence
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants continent after treatment ‐ three months
Specialised professional input interventions vs usual care or no treatment
RR 1.28 [0.81, 2.02]1 study · 121 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
Number of incontinent episodes
Specialised professional input interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Perception of improvement or cure
Specialised professional input interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health status and quality of life
Specialised professional input interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional ability
Specialised professional input interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Specialised professional input interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Complementary therapy interventions compared with usual care or no treatment for treating urinary incontinence after stroke

Population: people with stroke and urinary incontinence
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants continent after treatment
Complementary therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
RR 2.82 [1.57, 5.07]5 studies · 524 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Number of incontinent episodes
Complementary therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Perception of improvement or cure
Complementary therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health status and quality of life
Complementary therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional ability
Complementary therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse events
Complementary therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Physical therapy interventions compared with usual care or no treatment for treating urinary incontinence after stroke

Population: people with stroke and urinary incontinence
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants continent after treatment
Physical therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Number of incontinent episodes
Physical therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 142 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Perception of improvement or cure
Physical therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Health status and quality of life
Physical therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Functional ability: mean Barthel score (continuous variables)
Physical therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
MD 8.97 [1.27, 16.68]81 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Adverse events
Physical therapy interventions vs usual care or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies