Cochrane · systematic review · CD004080

Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery versus later commencement for length of hospital stay and postoperative complications

Herbert, G, Perry, R, Andersen, HK, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

Colorectal2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
17
current version
GRADE rated
17
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 23.5%Low 13 · 76.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery versus later commencement

Population: lower gastrointestinal surgery
10 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Length of hospital stay (days)
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
no estimate extracted16 studies · 1346 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Wound infection
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
RR 0.99 [0.64, 1.52]12 studies · 1181 participantsVery low
Intraabdominal abscess
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
RR 1 [0.26, 3.8]6 studies · 554 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Anastomotic leakage/dehiscence
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
RR 0.78 [0.38, 1.61]13 studies · 1232 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Pneumonia (within hospital stay)
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
RR 0.88 [0.32, 2.42]10 studies · 954 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Mortality
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
RR 0.56 [0.21, 1.52]12 studies · 1179 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Vomiting
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
RR 1.23 [0.96, 1.58]7 studies · 613 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Nausea
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
RR 0.95 [0.71, 1.26]2 studies · 118 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Nausea and vomiting
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
RR 0.92 [0.6, 1.41]4 studies · 238 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Quality of Life
Early enteral nutrition within 24 hours of lower gastrointestinal surgery vs later commencement
no estimate extracted1 study · 28 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Subgroup and Sensitivity analyses

Population: lower gastrointestinal surgery
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Subgroup 1: Length of hospital stay (days) distal to ligament of Treitz
no estimate extracted13 studies · 1156 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Subgroup 2: Length of hospital stay (days) distal and proximal to ligament of Treitz
no estimate extracted3 studies · 190 participantsLow
Subgroup 3: Length of hospital stay (days) oral feeding only
no estimate extracted11 studies · 1075 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Subgroup 4: Length of hospital stay (days) tube feeding with/without oral feeding
no estimate extracted5 studies · 271 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Sensitivity analysis 2: Removing studies with imputed results
no estimate extracted5 studies · 396 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Senstivity analysis 3: Worst case scenario imputation
no estimate extracted3 studies · 235 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Senstivity analysis 4: Best case scenario imputation
no estimate extracted3 studies · 235 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency