Cochrane · systematic review · CD003469

Botulinum toxin A as an adjunct to treatment in the management of the upper limb in children with spastic cerebral palsy (UPDATE)

Hoare, BJ, Wallen, MA, Imms, C, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2010 · Cochrane Library

Movement DisordersAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
42
current version
GRADE rated
36
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 6 · 14.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 19 · 45.2%High 17 · 40.5%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

BoNT‐A compared to Placebo/no treatment for children with cerebral palsy

Population: children with cerebral palsy
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Elbow flexor spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 180.
BoNT‐A vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsModerate
Wrist flexor spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 90.
BoNT‐A vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsModerate
Quality of movement (18 mths ‐ 8yrs) Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 13 participantsModerate
Quality of movement (5 yrs ‐ 15yrs) The Melbourne Assessment. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 21 participantsModerate
Goal attainment Goal Attainment Scaling3. Scale from: 20 to 80.
BoNT‐A vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 32 participantsModerate
Occupational performance ‐ performance Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 10.
BoNT‐A vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsHigh
Occuptional performance ‐ satisfaction Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 10.
BoNT‐A vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 34 participantsHigh

BoNT‐A/OT compared to OT only for children with cerebral palsy

Population: children with cerebral palsy
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Elbow flexor spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 180.
BoNT‐A/OT vs OT only
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsHigh
Wrist flexor spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 90.
BoNT‐A/OT vs OT only
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsHigh
Quality of movement (18 mths ‐ 8yrs) Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A/OT vs OT only
no estimate extracted3 studies · 84 participantsHigh
Quality of movement (5 yrs ‐ 15yrs) The Melbourne Assessment. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A/OT vs OT only
no estimate extracted3 studies · 69 participantsHigh
Goal attainment Goal Attainment Scaling2. Scale from: 20 to 80.
BoNT‐A/OT vs OT only
no estimate extracted4 studies · 152 participantsHigh
Occupational performance ‐ performance Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 10.
BoNT‐A/OT vs OT only
no estimate extracted3 studies · 109 participantsHigh
Occupational performance ‐ satisfaction Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A/OT vs OT only
no estimate extracted3 studies · 109 participantsHigh

BoNT‐A/OT compared to BoNT‐A only for children with cerebral palsy

Population: patients with children with cerebral palsy
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Elbow flexors spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 180.
BoNT‐A/OT vs BoNT‐A only
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsModerate
Wrist flexor spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 90.
BoNT‐A/OT vs BoNT‐A only
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsHigh
Quality of movement (18 mths ‐ 8yrs) Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A/OT vs BoNT‐A only
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsModerate
Quality of movement (5 yrs ‐ 15yrs) The Melbourne Assessment. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A/OT vs BoNT‐A only
no estimate extracted1 study · 22 participantsHigh
Goal attainment Goal Attainment Scaling3. Scale from: 20 to 80.
BoNT‐A/OT vs BoNT‐A only
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsHigh
Occupational performance ‐ performance Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 10.
BoNT‐A/OT vs BoNT‐A only
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsModerate
Occupational performance ‐ satisfaction Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 10.
BoNT‐A/OT vs BoNT‐A only
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsModerate

BoNT‐A/OT compared to Placebo/no treatment for children with cerebral palsy

Population: children with cerebral palsy
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Elbow flexor spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A/OT vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsModerate
Wrist flexor spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 90.
BoNT‐A/OT vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsHigh
Quality of movement (18 mths ‐ 8yrs) Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A/OT vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 13 participantsModerate
Quality of movement (5 yrs ‐ 15yrs) The Melbourne Assessment. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A/OT vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 19 participantsModerate
Goal attainment Goal Attainment Scaling3. Scale from: 20 to 80.
BoNT‐A/OT vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 33 participantsHigh
Occupational performance ‐ performance Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 10.
BoNT‐A/OT vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsHigh
Occupational performance ‐ satisfaction Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 10.
BoNT‐A/OT vs Placebo/no treatment
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsHigh

BoNT‐A only compared to OT only for children with cerebral palsy

Population: children with cerebral palsy
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Elbow flexor spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 180.
BoNT‐A only vs OT only
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsHigh
Wrist flexor spasticity modified Tardieu scale. Scale from: 0 to 90.
BoNT‐A only vs OT only
no estimate extracted1 study · 35 participantsModerate
Quality of movement (18 mths ‐ 8yrs) QUEST. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A only vs OT only
no estimate extracted1 study · 13 participantsModerate
Quality of movement (5 yrs ‐ 15yrs) The Melbourne Assessment. Scale from: 0 to 100.
BoNT‐A only vs OT only
no estimate extracted1 study · 21 participantsModerate
Goal attainment Goal attainment scaling3. Scale from: 20 to 80.
BoNT‐A only vs OT only
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsModerate
Occupational performance ‐ performance Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 10.
BoNT‐A only vs OT only
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsModerate
Occupational performance ‐ satisfaction Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Scale from: 0 to 10.
BoNT‐A only vs OT only
no estimate extracted1 study · 36 participantsModerate

High dose BoNT‐A compared to Low dose BoNT‐A in children with cerebral palsy

Population: children with cerebral palsy
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Elbow flexor spasticity
High dose BoNT‐A vs Low dose BoNT‐A
no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsUngraded
Wrist flexor spasticity
High dose BoNT‐A vs Low dose BoNT‐A
no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsUngraded
Quality of movement (18 mths ‐ 8yrs) Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test. Scale from: 0 to 100.
High dose BoNT‐A vs Low dose BoNT‐A
no estimate extracted1 study · 39 participantsModerate
Goal attainment
High dose BoNT‐A vs Low dose BoNT‐A
no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsUngraded
Quality of movement (5 yrs to 15 yrs)
High dose BoNT‐A vs Low dose BoNT‐A
no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsUngraded
Occupational performance ‐ performance
High dose BoNT‐A vs Low dose BoNT‐A
no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsUngraded
Occupational performance ‐ satisfaction
High dose BoNT‐A vs Low dose BoNT‐A
no estimate extracted0 studies · 1 participantsUngraded