Cochrane · systematic review · CD002892
Individual‐level interventions for reducing occupational stress in healthcare workers
Tamminga, SJ, Emal, LM, Boschman, JS, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
12
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 1 · 8.3%Very low 5 · 41.7%Low 6 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Show all 4 versionsAn intervention in which one's attention is on the experience of stress (feelings, thoughts, behavior) compared to no intervention/wait list/placebo/no stress‐reduction intervention for stress reduction in healthcare workers
Population: healthcare workers
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Stress symptoms ( An intervention in which one's attention is on the experience of stress (feelings, thoughts, behavior) vs no intervention/wait list/placebo/no stress‐reduction intervention | no estimate extracted | 41 studies · 3645 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |
Stress symptoms ( An intervention in which one's attention is on the experience of stress (feelings, thoughts, behavior) vs no intervention/wait list/placebo/no stress‐reduction intervention | no estimate extracted | 19 studies · 1851 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |
Stress symptoms ( An intervention in which one's attention is on the experience of stress (feelings, thoughts, behavior) vs no intervention/wait list/placebo/no stress‐reduction intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 68 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
An intervention in which one's attention is away from the experience of stress compared to no intervention/wait list/placebo/no stress‐reduction intervention for stress reduction in healthcare workers
Population: healthcare workers
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Stress symptoms ( An intervention in which one's attention is away from the experience of stress vs no intervention/wait list/placebo/no stress‐reduction intervention | no estimate extracted | 35 studies · 2366 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |
Stress symptoms ( An intervention in which one's attention is away from the experience of stress vs no intervention/wait list/placebo/no stress‐reduction intervention | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 427 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |
Stress symptoms ( An intervention in which one's attention is away from the experience of stress vs no intervention/wait list/placebo/no stress‐reduction intervention | no estimate extracted | 0 studies · 0 participants | Ungraded |
An intervention in which the focus is on work‐related risk factors on an individual level compared to no intervention/no stress‐reduction interventionfor stress reduction in healthcare workers
Population: healthcare workers
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Stress symptoms ( An intervention in which the focus is on work‐related risk factors on an individual level vs no intervention/no stress‐reduction interventionfor stress reduction | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 87 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Stress symptoms ( An intervention in which the focus is on work‐related risk factors on an individual level vs no intervention/no stress‐reduction interventionfor stress reduction | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 152 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
Stress symptoms ( An intervention in which the focus is on work‐related risk factors on an individual level vs no intervention/no stress‐reduction interventionfor stress reduction | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 161 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency |
A combination of individual‐level interventions compared to no intervention/wait list/no stress‐reduction intervention for stress reduction in healthcare workers
Population: healthcare workers
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Stress symptoms ( A combination of individual‐level interventions vs no intervention/wait list/no stress‐reduction intervention | no estimate extracted | 15 studies · 1003 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, publication bias |
Stress symptoms ( A combination of individual‐level interventions vs no intervention/wait list/no stress‐reduction intervention | no estimate extracted | 6 studies · 574 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Stress symptoms ( A combination of individual‐level interventions vs no intervention/wait list/no stress‐reduction intervention | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 88 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |