Cochrane · systematic review · CD002856

Giving women their own case notes to carry during pregnancy

Brown, HC, Smith, HJ, Mori, R, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library

Pregnancy and ChildbirthAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 4 · 57.1%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Case notes versus control

Population: pregnant women from the time of their first antenatal visit to the end of the puerperium
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Women who felt in control
Case notes vs control
RR 1.56 [1.18, 2.06]2 studies · 450 participantsModerate
Women's satisfaction with antenatal care
Case notes vs control
RR 1.09 [0.92, 1.29]2 studies · 698 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Women who wanted to carry case notes in subsequent pregnancy
Case notes vs control
RR 1.79 [1.57, 2.03]3 studies · 552 participantsLow
Downgraded: inconsistency
Breastfeeding
Case notes vs control
RR 1 [0.99, 1.02]2 studies · 704 participantsModerate
Epidural analgesia used in labour
Case notes vs control
RR 1.43 [0.96, 2.13]1 study · 212 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Caesarean section
Case notes vs control
RR 1.51 [1.1, 2.08]1 study · 501 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Stillbirth or neonatal death
Case notes vs control
RR 1 [0.99, 1.01]2 studies · 713 participantsModerate