Cochrane · systematic review · CD002199
Operative procedures for fissure in ano
Nelson, RL, Chattopadhyay, A, Brooks, W, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2011 · Cochrane Library
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 2 · 50%High 1 · 25%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Current version onlySensitivity Analysis; Stretch versus Sphincterotomy excluding Marby & Weaver for fissure in ano
Population: patients with fissure in ano
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Persistance of the Fissure Sensitivity Analysis; Stretch vs Sphincterotomy excluding Marby & Weaver | OR 4.42 [1.75, 11.18] | 5 studies · 328 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Minor incontinence to flatus Sensitivity Analysis; Stretch vs Sphincterotomy excluding Marby & Weaver | OR 5.73 [2.31, 14.2] | 5 studies · 309 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Open versus closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy for fissure in ano
Population: patients with fissure in ano
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Persistence of the anal fissure Open vs closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy | OR 1 [0.4, 2.48] | 5 studies · 336 participants | High |
Minor incontinence to flatus Open vs closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy | OR 0.87 [0.41, 1.83] | 5 studies · 336 participants | Moderate |
Sensitivity Analysis; Stretch versus Sphincterotomy excluding Marby & Weaver for fissure in ano
Population: patients with fissure in ano
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Persistance of the Fissure Sensitivity Analysis; Stretch vs Sphincterotomy excluding Marby & Weaver | OR 4.42 [1.75, 11.18] | 5 studies · 328 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias |
Minor incontinence to flatus Sensitivity Analysis; Stretch vs Sphincterotomy excluding Marby & Weaver | OR 5.73 [2.31, 14.2] | 5 studies · 309 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Open versus closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy for fissure in ano
Population: patients with fissure in ano
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Persistence of the anal fissure Open vs closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy | OR 1 [0.4, 2.48] | 5 studies · 336 participants | High |
Minor incontinence to flatus Open vs closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy | OR 0.87 [0.41, 1.83] | 5 studies · 336 participants | Moderate |