Cochrane · systematic review · CD002008

Dietary advice with or without oral nutritional supplements for disease‐related malnutrition in adults

Baldwin, C, de van der Schueren, MAE, Kruizenga, HM, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2021 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
35
current version
GRADE rated
30
No studies
5
Included studies
NR
No studies 5 · 14.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 5.7%Low 26 · 74.3%Moderate 2 · 5.7%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Dietary advice compared with no advice for disease‐related malnutrition in adults

Population: adults with disease‐related malnutrition
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
Dietary advice vs no advice
RR 0.87 [0.26, 2.96]7 studies · 574 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Number of people admitted or readmitted to hospital
Dietary advice vs no advice
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Length of hospital stay (days)
Dietary advice vs no advice
no estimate extracted1 study · 148 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Complications
Dietary advice vs no advice
no estimate extracted1 study · 148 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Change in weight (kg)
Dietary advice vs no advice
no estimate extracted10 studies · 802 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Change in fat‐free mass (kg)
Dietary advice vs no advice
no estimate extracted2 studies · 98 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Change in global QoL score
Dietary advice vs no advice
no estimate extracted5 studies · 421 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Dietary advice compared with oral nutritional supplements for disease‐related malnutrition in adults

Population: adults with disease‐related malnutrition
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
Dietary advice vs oral nutritional supplements
RR 0.66 [0.34, 1.26]8 studies · 576 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Number of people admitted or re‐admitted to hospital
Dietary advice vs oral nutritional supplements
RR 0.36 [0.04, 3.24]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Length of hospital stay (days) Â
Dietary advice vs oral nutritional supplements
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Complications Â
Dietary advice vs oral nutritional supplements
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in weight (kg)
Dietary advice vs oral nutritional supplements
no estimate extracted9 studies · 517 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Change in fat‐free mass (kg)
Dietary advice vs oral nutritional supplements
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Change in global QoL score
Dietary advice vs oral nutritional supplements
no estimate extracted4 studies · 283 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Dietary advice compared with dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements for disease‐related malnutrition in adults

Population: adults with disease‐related malnutrition
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
Dietary advice vs dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements
RR 0.92 [0.47, 1.8]10 studies · 777 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Number of people admitted or re‐admitted to hospital
Dietary advice vs dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements
RR 1.7 [1.04, 2.77]1 study · 114 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Length of hospital stay (days)
Dietary advice vs dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements
no estimate extracted2 studies · 202 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Complications
Dietary advice vs dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements
RR 0.75 [0.56, 0.99]3 studies · 317 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Change in weight (kg)
Dietary advice vs dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements
no estimate extracted14 studies · 931 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Change in fat‐free mass (kg)
Dietary advice vs dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements
no estimate extracted3 studies · 187 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness
Change in global QoL score
Dietary advice vs dietary advice plus oral nutritional supplements
no estimate extracted4 studies · 321 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness

Dietary advice plus supplements if required compared with no advice for disease‐related malnutrition in adults

Population: adults with disease‐related malnutrition
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
Dietary advice plus supplements if required vs no advice
RR 0.82 [0.58, 1.16]15 studies · 1261 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Number of people admitted or re‐admitted to hospital
Dietary advice plus supplements if required vs no advice
RR 0.83 [0.59, 1.15]7 studies · 673 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Length of hospital stay (days)
Dietary advice plus supplements if required vs no advice
no estimate extracted3 studies · 400 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Complications
Dietary advice plus supplements if required vs no advice
RR 0.56 [0.22, 1.46]2 studies · 280 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Change in weight (kg)
Dietary advice plus supplements if required vs no advice
no estimate extracted17 studies · 1192 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Change in fat‐free mass (kg)
Dietary advice plus supplements if required vs no advice
no estimate extracted4 studies · 262 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Change in global QoL score
Dietary advice plus supplements if required vs no advice
no estimate extracted7 studies · 389 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Dietary advice plus supplements compared with no dietary advice plus no supplements for disease‐related malnutrition in adults

Population: adults with disease‐related malnutrition
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Mortality
Dietary advice plus supplements vs no dietary advice plus no supplements
RR 0.91 [0.55, 1.52]7 studies · 797 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Number of people admitted or re‐admitted to hospital
Dietary advice plus supplements vs no dietary advice plus no supplements
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Length of hospital stay (days)
Dietary advice plus supplements vs no dietary advice plus no supplements
no estimate extracted2 studies · 258 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Complications
Dietary advice plus supplements vs no dietary advice plus no supplements
RR 0.42 [0.2, 0.89]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Change in weight (kg)
Dietary advice plus supplements vs no dietary advice plus no supplements
no estimate extracted8 studies · 620 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Change in fat‐free mass (kg)
Dietary advice plus supplements vs no dietary advice plus no supplements
no estimate extracted3 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Change in global QoL score
Dietary advice plus supplements vs no dietary advice plus no supplements
no estimate extracted4 studies · 357 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness