Cochrane · intervention · CD001830

Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in permanent teeth

Ahovuo‐Saloranta, A, Forss, H, Walsh, T, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Oral HealthDental caries5 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
Full textEvery question was extracted from the full review (methods and results), not only its Summary of Findings table.
Questions
11
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
2
Included studies
38
as reported
No studies 2 · 18.2%Ungraded 6 · 54.5%Very low 2 · 18.2%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 9.1%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Review question

ElementPlanned (methods)Found (results)
PopulationChildren and adolescents from the general population, aged up to 20 years38 studies with 7924 randomised participants; children aged 5 to 16 years; recruited from schools or dental clinics; studies conducted in 20 countries
InterventionResin/composite-based, glass ionomer-based, or new types (ormocer-based) fissure sealants placed on occlusal surfaces of permanent premolar or molar teeth to prevent caries; applied on sound surfaces or enamel lesions; direct application or after mechanical preparation of the surfaceResin/composite-based sealants (n=15 studies); glass ionomer-based sealants (n=18, incl. resin-modified); ormocer-based sealant (n=1)
ComparisonNo sealant, or a different type of sealant materialNo sealant (n=18); different sealant material (n=24)
OutcomesIncidence of caries expressed as caries or no caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent premolar or molar teeth; caries defined as caries into dentine; adverse events and safety of sealantsIncidence of caries on occlusal surfaces (n=38); retention of sealants (n=38); adverse events (n=4, none observed)
Study designsRandomised controlled trials with at least 12 months follow-up; both parallel-group and split-mouth study designs; unit of randomisation could be individual, group, tooth or tooth-pairSplit-mouth and parallel-group studies (38 total)
TimingAt least 12 months follow-upFollow-up periods: 12 months (n=7); 24 months (n=16); 36 months (n=9); 48-54 months (n=5); 60 months (n=3); 72-84 months (n=2); 108 months (n=1)

Search date: 2016-08. Databases: Cochrane Oral Health's Trials Register; CENTRAL; MEDLINE Ovid; Embase Ovid; ClinicalTrials.gov; WHO ICTRP

Questions and results

Current version only

Resin-based fissure sealant (2nd/3rd/4th generation) vs No sealant (control/no treatment)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB5 (current) · 5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (48-54 months)
48-54 months
OR 0.21 [0.16, 0.28]4 studiesUngraded
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (12 months)
12 months
OR 0.17 [0.10, 0.30]7 studiesUngraded
Adverse effects
Two trials measured adverse effects. None were reported.2 studiesUngraded
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (36 months)
36 months
OR 0.17 [0.11, 0.27]7 studiesUngraded
Dentine caries in permanent molars (24 months)
24 months
OR 0.12 [0.08, 0.19]
160 per 1000 (16%); 400 per 1000 (40%); 700 per 1000 (70%) vs 52 per 1000 (31 to 74); 63 per 1000 (38 to 96); 189 per…
7 studies · 1322 participantsModerate
Downgraded: indirectness

Glass ionomer-based sealant vs No sealant (control/no treatment)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB5 (current) · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse effects
Adverse effects not measured.NRNo studies
Dentine caries in permanent molars (24 months)
24 months
Inconclusive results: two studies slightly favoured glass ionomers (Liu 2014b OR 0.46 (0.23-0.91); Tagliaferro 2011) evaluating 426 children; one study (Songpaisan 1995) found no difference (MD DFS -0.18 (-0.39 to…3 studies · 830 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness

Glass ionomer-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB5 (current) · 2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adverse effects
One trial measured adverse effects. None reported.1 studyUngraded
Dentine caries in permanent molars
12-72 months
Inconsistent effect (differences in products, comparisons, outcomes, outcome reporting times, background fluoride and age groups); 21 trials (3883 participants randomised); very low quality21 studies · 3883 participantsVery low
Downgraded: inconsistency, indirectness

New types of fissure sealant (e.g. ormocer-based) vs No sealant (control)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB5 (current) · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Outcome NR
No studies comparing new types of fissure sealants with no sealant were included.NRNo studies

Ormocer-based sealant vs Low-viscosity glass ionomer sealant

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB5 (current) · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars
24 months
Guler 2013 (N=50) compared ormocer-based sealant versus low-viscosity glass ionomer; not separately meta-analysed1 study · 50 participantsUngraded

Resin-based fissure sealant (2nd/3rd/4th generation) vs No sealant (control/no treatment)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB4 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (12 months)
12 months
OR 0.16 [0.08, 0.30]6 studiesUngraded
Dentine caries in permanent molars (24 months)
24 months
OR 0.12 [0.07, 0.19]
400 per 1000 (40%); 700 per 1000 (70%) vs 63 per 1000 (38 to 96); 190 per 1000 (122 to 272)
6 studies · 1066 participantsModerate
Downgraded: indirectness
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (36 months)
36 months
OR 0.17 [0.11, 0.27]7 studiesUngraded
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (48-54 months)
48-54 months
OR 0.21 [0.16, 0.28]4 studiesUngraded

Glass ionomer-based sealant vs No sealant (control/no treatment)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB4 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars (DFS increment, 24 months)
24 months
MD -0.18 [-0.39, 0.03]
-0.18 [-0.39, 0.03] DFS increment (mean difference)
1 study · 404 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Glass ionomer-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB4 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars
12-84 months
Inconsistent effect (differences in comparisons, outcomes, outcome reporting times and background fluoride exposure); 15 trials (2939 participants randomised); very low quality15 studies · 2939 participantsVery low
Downgraded: inconsistency, indirectness

Resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI) sealant vs Resin-based sealant

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB4 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars
12-36 months
Inconsistent effect (different products, outcomes, outcome reporting times and age groups); 3 trials (418 participants randomised); very low quality3 studies · 418 participantsVery low
Downgraded: inconsistency, indirectness

Polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) vs Resin-based sealant

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB4 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars (24 months)
24 months
OR 0.65 [0.29, 1.48]2 studies · 68 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness

Resin-based fissure sealant (2nd/3rd/4th generation) vs No sealant (control/no treatment)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB3 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (36 months)
36 months
RR 0.30 [0.22, 0.40]3 studiesUngraded
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (12 months)
12 months
RR 0.13 [0.09, 0.20]3 studiesUngraded
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (48-54 months)
48-54 months
RR 0.40 [0.31, 0.51]3 studiesUngraded
Dentine caries in permanent molars (24 months)
24 months
RR 0.22 [0.15, 0.34]3 studiesUngraded

Glass ionomer-based sealant vs No sealant (control/no treatment)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB3 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars (DFS increment, 24 months)
24 months
MD 0.18 [-0.034, 0.39]1 study · 404 participantsUngraded

Glass ionomer-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB3 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars
24 months-7 years
Divergent across 8 studies (e.g. Poulsen RR 3.39, Kervanto-Seppala RR 3.86 favour resin; Arrow RR 0.19, Beiruti RR 0.28 favour glass ionomer; Forss RR 1.44 no difference); no meta-analysis8 studiesUngraded

Polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) vs Resin-based sealant

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB3 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars (24 months)
24 months
OR 0.61 [0.23, 1.66]2 studiesUngraded

Resin-based fissure sealant (2nd/3rd/4th generation) vs No sealant (control/no treatment)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB2 · 4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars (24 months)
24 months
RR 0.24 [0.20, 0.30]3 studiesUngraded
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (36 months)
36 months
RR 0.30 [0.26, 0.35]3 studiesUngraded
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (12 months)
12 months
RR 0.14 [0.09, 0.19]3 studiesUngraded
Caries on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (48-54 months)
48-54 months
RR 0.43 [0.37, 0.50]2 studiesUngraded

Glass ionomer-based sealant vs No sealant (control/no treatment)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars (DFS increment, 24 months)
24 months
MD 0.18 [-0.034, 0.39]1 study · 404 participantsUngraded

Glass ionomer-based sealant vs Resin-based sealant

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830.PUB2 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Dentine caries in permanent molars
24-84 months
Conflicting: Poulsen 2001 RR 3.39 (1.98-5.79) and Songpaisan 1995 MD -0.47 (-0.63 to -0.31) favour resin; Arrow 1995 RR 0.19 (0.09-0.43) favours glass ionomer; no meta-analysis3 studiesUngraded

Fissure sealant (resin-based or glass ionomer) vs No sealant (control)

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Caries increment on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (planned primary outcome)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

One type of fissure sealant vs Another type of fissure sealant

Population: Children and adolescents (general population, aged under 20 years)
CD001830 · 1 question
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Caries increment on occlusal surfaces of permanent molars (planned primary outcome)
no estimate extractedNRNo studies