Cochrane · systematic review · CD001711

User‐held personalised information for routine care of people with severe mental illness

Farrelly, S, Brown, GE, Flach, C, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013 · Cochrane Library

SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
2
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 33.3%Ungraded 2 · 33.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 2 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

User‐held information versus standard information for routine care of people with severe mental illness

Population: patients with routine care of people with severe mental illness
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Psychiatric hospital admission: psychiatric admission Numbers admitted
User‐held information vs standard information
RR 0.99 [0.71, 1.38]4 studies · 597 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Psychiatric hospital admission: compulsory admission Numbers admitted
User‐held information vs standard information
RR 0.64 [0.37, 1.1]3 studies · 507 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Death: causes other than suicide ‐ not reported
User‐held information vs standard information
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Violence ‐ not reported
User‐held information vs standard information
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Mental state: psychopathology
User‐held information vs standard information
no estimate extracted0 studies · 3 participantsUngraded
Satisfaction with health care
User‐held information vs standard information
no estimate extracted0 studies · 3 participantsUngraded