Cochrane · systematic review · CD001405

Oestrogen therapy for urinary incontinence in post‐menopausal women

Cody, JD, Jacobs, ML, Richardson, K, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library

IncontinenceAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
12
current version
GRADE rated
12
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 8.3%Low 4 · 33.3%Moderate 6 · 50%High 1 · 8.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Oestrogen compared to placebo or no treatment for urinary incontinence in post‐menopausal women

Population: patients with urinary incontinence in post‐menopausal women
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Incontinence not improved (generic inverse variance) (women's observations) ‐ Systemic administration (any incontinence)
Oestrogen vs placebo or no treatment
RR 1.32 [1.17, 1.48]6 studies · 6151 participantsLow
Incontinence not improved (generic inverse variance) (women's observations) ‐ Local administration (any incontinence)
Oestrogen vs placebo or no treatment
RR 0.74 [0.64, 0.86]4 studies · 213 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Incontinent episodes over 24 hours ‐ Systemic administration
Oestrogen vs placebo or no treatment
no estimate extracted2 studies · 82 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency
Number of women with urgency ‐ Systemic administration
Oestrogen vs placebo or no treatment
RR 1.05 [0.83, 1.33]2 studies · 89 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Number of women with urgency ‐ Local administration
Oestrogen vs placebo or no treatment
RR 0.38 [0.15, 0.99]2 studies · 90 participantsModerate
Downgraded: inconsistency
Number with adverse effects ‐ Systemic administration
Oestrogen vs placebo or no treatment
RR 13 [1.87, 90.21]1 study · 40 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Number with adverse effects ‐ Local administration
Oestrogen vs placebo or no treatment
RR 1.33 [0.32, 5.61]2 studies · 144 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision

Oestrogen versus other treatments for urinary incontinence in post‐menopausal women

Population: patients with urinary incontinence in post‐menopausal women
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number with incontinence not improved (women's observations) ‐ Oestrogen vs PPA
Oestrogen vs other treatments
RR 0.83 [0.63, 1.09]2 studies · 57 participantsModerate
Adverse effects ‐ oestrogen vs PPA
Oestrogen vs other treatments
no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision

Oestrogen + other treatments versus placebo for urinary incontinence in post‐menopausal women

Population: patients with urinary incontinence in post‐menopausal women
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Incontinent episodes over 24 hours ‐ oestrogen + progesterone vs placebo
Oestrogen + other treatments vs placebo
no estimate extracted1 study · 83 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
Incontinence not improved (generic inverse variance) (women's observation) ‐ oestrogen + other treatments versus placebo
Oestrogen + other treatments vs placebo
RR 1.11 [1.04, 1.18]3 studies · 10635 participantsModerate
Number with incontinence not improved (women's observations) ‐ oestrogen + progesterone vs placebo (Copy)
Oestrogen + other treatments vs placebo
RR 1.08 [1.01, 1.16]2 studies · 1514 participantsHigh