Cochrane · systematic review · CD001096
The effects of on‐screen, point of care computer reminders on processes and outcomes of care
Shojania, KG, Jennings, A, Ramsay, CR, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2009 · Cochrane Library
Effective Practice and Organisation of CareAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
6
current version
GRADE rated
6
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 5 · 83.3%Moderate 1 · 16.7%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Summary of findings
Population: Physicians (any specialty)
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
All process outcomes | no estimate extracted | 114 studies · 935 participants | Low Downgraded: inconsistency |
Prescription of medications | no estimate extracted | 64 studies · 276 participants | Low Downgraded: inconsistency, publication bias |
Prescription of recommended vaccines | no estimate extracted | 30 studies · 212 participants | Moderate Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Test ordering | no estimate extracted | 25 studies · 539 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Elements of recommended documentation | no estimate extracted | 11 studies · 66 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias |
Other process outcomes | no estimate extracted | 32 studies · 300 participants | Low Downgraded: inconsistency |