Cochrane · systematic review · CD000381
Life skills programmes for chronic mental illnesses
Tungpunkom, P, Maayan, N, Soares‐Weiser, K · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2012 · Cochrane Library
SchizophreniaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 10 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Life skills programme compared to standard care for chronic mental illnesses
Population: patients with chronic mental illnesses
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Life skills: No important change in household activity skills Royal Edinburgh Occupational Therapy Assessment Form Life skills programme vs standard care | RR 0.24 [0.01, 4.72] | 1 study · 10 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Life skills: No important change kitchen skills Royal Edinburgh Occupational Therapy Assessment Form Life skills programme vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 10 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Life skills: No important change laundry skills Royal Edinburgh Occupational Therapy Assessment Form Life skills programme vs standard care | RR 0.14 [0.01, 2.38] | 1 study · 10 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Life skills: No important change self‐care skills Royal Edinburgh Occupational Therapy Assessment Form Life skills programme vs standard care | RR 1 [0.28, 3.54] | 1 study · 10 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Leaving the study early Life skills programme vs standard care | RR 1.16 [0.4, 3.36] | 5 studies · 345 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mental state: endpoint score PANSS positive syndrome. Scale from: 7 to 48. Life skills programme vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 32 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life: Endpoint score Quality of Well‐Being Scale index. Scale from: 0 to 10. Life skills programme vs standard care | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 32 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Life skills programme compared to attention‐control for chronic mental illnesses
Population: patients with chronic mental illnesses
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Life skills: Endpoint score UCSD Performance‐based Skills Assessment ‐ UPSA Life skills programme vs attention‐control | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 158 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Mental state: Endpoint score PANSS. Scale from: 16 to 96. Life skills programme vs attention‐control | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 158 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |
Quality of life: Endpoint score Quality of Well‐Being Scale. Scale from: 0 to 100. Life skills programme vs attention‐control | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 158 participants | Very low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |