Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 2 reviews · Implants and prosthodontics · All outcomes

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 20%GRADE not reported 2 · 40%Very low 2 · 40%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method

Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) compared with two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 3.15 [0.14, 72.88]
1 study · 39 participants
Very low

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method

Number of border adjustments and sore spots after insertion of denture · Completely edentulous people

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
Not measured
0 studies
No studies found

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method

Oral health-related quality of life · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT) compared with two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
MD 0.5 [-2.67, 3.67]
1 study · 39 participants
Very low

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method

Operator-assessed quality of the denture (retention and stability) · Completely edentulous people

1 finding from 1 review

Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
3 to 6 months
There was insufficient evidence of a clear difference between groups for operator-assessed quality of the dentures for retention and stability of dentures (Regis 2013).
1 study
GRADE not reported

Glass ionomer (GIC) permanent cement vs Zinc phosphate cement

Post-operative hypersensitivity, tooth vitality, prosthesis retention and secondary caries · Patients receiving cemented FDPs; split-mouth

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes
No difference in post-operative hypersensitivity, tooth vitality, prosthesis retention, and secondary caries; paired data not provided in the correct form; trial at high risk of bias (narrative)
1 study
GRADE not reported