Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

14 questions · 14 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 4 · 28.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 7.1%Low 9 · 64.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures

Proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) posttreatment‐procedure LASIK; Mean higher‐order aberrations (HOAs) post‐treatment, measured by machine with wavefront sensor; proportion of eyes wi... · Adults with refractive errors

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures

Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment. ‐ 12 months · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or… compared with conventional procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures

Proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) posttreatment:12 months ‐ Procedure PRK · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best… compared with conventional procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures

Proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction: 12 months ‐ Procedure PRK · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction:… compared with conventional procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures

Eyes within ± 0.5 D of target refraction · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront‐optimized procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction… compared with wavefront‐guided procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures

Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment. ‐ 12 months · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront‐optimized procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or… compared with wavefront‐guided procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures

Loss of 1 or more lines of BSCVA at 12 months post treatment · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront‐optimized procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best… compared with wavefront‐guided procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review