Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 2 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 25%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 2 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

Adverse outcomes ‐ glare and halo scores at 3 months (grade 0 ‐ none; grade 1 ‐ very low; grade 2 ‐ low; grade 3 ‐ moderate; grade 4 ‐ high; and grade 5 ‐ very high) · adult participants (≥ 18 years) with myopia

1 finding from 1 review

Laser‐assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of myopia 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Very low

Hand‐held mouse‐based electronic device vs optical device

Ease and frequency of use Task difficulty score (0 = very easy to use 5 = extremely difficult) · adults with low vision

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Moderate

Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs head‐mounted electronic device (HMD)

Ease and frequency of use Task difficulty score (0 = very easy to use 5 = extremely difficult) · adults with low vision

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Low

Stand‐mounted closed circuit television (CCTV) vs optical device

Ease and frequency of use Task difficulty score (0 = very easy to use 5 = extremely difficult) · adults with low vision

1 finding from 1 review

Reading aids for adults with low vision 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Moderate