Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 5 · 71.4%High 0 · 0%

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Anterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Apical compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination ‐ Posterior compartment prolapse compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy vs alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension

Bladder function ‐ Stress incontinence · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal uterosacral colpopexy showed no clear difference in bladder function ‐ Stress urinary incontinence compared with alternative vaginal native tissue apical suspension (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review