Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

20 questions · 20 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 20%Low 10 · 50%Moderate 6 · 30%High 0 · 0%

Vaginal hysteropexy vs sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysteropexy vs sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

De novo dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) review 1 to 3 years · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in painful intercourse ‐ De novo dyspareunia compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysterectomy vs vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysterectomy vs sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or greater) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy/cervicopexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review