Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

12 questions · 12 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 25%GRADE not reported 3 · 25%Very low 2 · 16.7%Low 3 · 25%Moderate 1 · 8.3%High 0 · 0%

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) vs no intervention

Infection · women with subfertility

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 334 participants
GRADE not reported

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) vs no intervention

Haemorrhage · women with subfertility

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) vs no intervention

Long‐term complications · women with subfertility

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) vs no intervention

Live birth · women with subfertility

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) showed no clear difference in live birth compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.13 [0.67, 1.91]
1 study · 334 participants
Low

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) vs no intervention

Clinical pregnancy · women with subfertility

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.14 [0.71, 1.84]
1 study · 334 participants
Low

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) vs no intervention

Intravasation · women with subfertility

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Live birth · women with subfertility

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 2035 participants
GRADE not reported

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Clinical pregnancy · women with subfertility

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) may leads to higher clinical pregnancy compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.42 [1.1, 1.85]
6 studies · 2598 participants
Low

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Intravasation · women with subfertility

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) probably leads to higher intravasation compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 5 [2.25, 11.12]
4 studies · 1912 participants
Moderate

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Infection · women with subfertility

It is very uncertain whether tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) changes infection compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.22 [0.04, 1.22]
2 studies · 662 participants
Very low

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Haemorrhage · women with subfertility

It is very uncertain whether tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) changes haemorrhage compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.65 [0.4, 1.06]
2 studies · 662 participants
Very low

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Congenital abnormalities · women with subfertility

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 1119 participants
GRADE not reported