Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

157 questions · 161 findings · 19 reviews · Incontinence · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 52 · 32.3%GRADE not reported 10 · 6.2%Very low 24 · 14.9%Low 36 · 22.4%Moderate 35 · 21.7%High 4 · 2.5%

Surgery with excision of failed tape vs surgery without excision of tape

Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery with excision of failed tape vs surgery without excision of tape

Number of women whose incontinence was improved or cured ‐ · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery with excision of failed tape vs surgery without excision of tape

Objective cure rates in the longer‐term ‐ more than 12 months, · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery with excision of failed tape vs surgery without excision of tape

General health status evaluation e.g. Short Form (SF)‐36 ‐ not reported · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery with excision of failed tape vs surgery without excision of tape

Condition‐specific instruments designed to assess incontinence ‐ e.g. BFLUTS · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

One type of repeat midurethral tape vs another type of repeat midurethral tape

Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Repeat surgery for urinary incontinence · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation plus surgery vs surgery

Cure: number of women with self‐reported continence · women with stress urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether electrical stimulation plus surgery changes cure: number of women with self‐reported continence compared with surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation plus surgery vs surgery

Improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI (cured or improved) · women with stress urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether electrical stimulation plus surgery changes improvement: number of women with self‐reported improvement in SUI… compared with surgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal surgery with mesh vs non‐mesh repair

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal surgery with mesh showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with without mesh (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review