evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

14 questions · 14 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 7.1%Low 9 · 64.3%Moderate 4 · 28.6%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings table ‐ routine monitoring vs no routine monitoring of gastric residual

Risk of necrotising enterocolitis stage ≥ 2 · preterm infants

Summary of findings table ‐ routine monitoring showed no clear difference in risk of necrotising enterocolitis stage ≥ 2 compared with no routine monitoring of gastric residual (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ routine monitoring vs no routine monitoring of gastric residual

Number of infants with feed interruption episodes (lasting ≥ 12 hours) · preterm infants

Summary of findings table ‐ routine monitoring may leads to higher number of infants with feed interruption episodes (lasting ≥ 12 hours) compared with no routine monitoring of gastric residual (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ routine monitoring vs no routine monitoring of gastric residual

Risk of invasive Infection · preterm infants

Summary of findings table ‐ routine monitoring probably leads to higher risk of invasive infection compared with no routine monitoring of gastric residual (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ routine monitoring vs no routine monitoring of gastric residual

Mortality before hospital discharge · preterm infants

Summary of findings table ‐ routine monitoring showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality before hospital discharge compared with no routine monitoring of gastric residual (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual vs quality of gastric residual alone

Number of infants with feed interruption episodes (lasting ≥ 12 hours) · feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual changes number of infants with feed interruption episodes (lasting ≥ 12 hours) compared with quality of gastric residual alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual vs quality of gastric residual alone

Risk of invasive Infection · feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual showed no clear difference in risk of invasive Infection compared with quality of gastric residual alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual vs quality of gastric residual alone

Mortality before hospital discharge · feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality before hospital discharge compared with quality of gastric residual alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual vs quality of gastric residual alone

Risk of necrotising enterocolitis stage ≥ 2 · feed interruption while monitoring gastric residual

Summary of findings table ‐ Quality and volume of gastric residual showed no clear difference in risk of necrotising enterocolitis stage ≥ 2 compared with quality of gastric residual alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review