Summary of findings for the main comparison. Motor imagery vs other therapies (control)
Motor function · People performing gait rehabilitation after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted3 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 50%Very low 3 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Motor imagery vs other therapies (control)
Activity Gait speed · People performing gait rehabilitation after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted6 studies · 191 participantsVery low
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Motor imagery vs other therapies (control)
Functional mobility · People performing gait rehabilitation after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted4 studies · 116 participantsVery low
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Motor imagery vs other therapies (control)
Dependence on personal assistance · People performing gait rehabilitation after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted10 studies · 385 participantsGRADE not reported
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Motor imagery vs other therapies (control)
Walking endurance · People performing gait rehabilitation after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 30 participantsGRADE not reported
Summary of findings for the main comparison. Motor imagery vs other therapies (control)
Adverse events (including pain, falls and all‐cause deaths) · People performing gait rehabilitation after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted7 studies · 252 participantsGRADE not reported