Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 5 · 71.4%Very low 1 · 14.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 14.3%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Implantable loop recorder vs conventional diagnostic workup

Other adverse events · people with unexplained recurrent syncope

1 finding from 1 review

Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic workup for unexplained recurrent syncope 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 447 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Implantable loop recorder vs conventional diagnostic workup

All‐cause short‐term mortality · people with unexplained recurrent syncope

1 finding from 1 review

Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic workup for unexplained recurrent syncope 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Implantable loop recorder vs conventional diagnostic workup

All‐cause long‐term mortality · people with unexplained recurrent syncope

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings for the main comparison. Implantable loop recorder changes all‐cause long‐term mortality compared with conventional diagnostic workup (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic workup for unexplained recurrent syncope 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.97 [0.41, 2.3]
2 studies · 255 participants
Very low

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Implantable loop recorder vs conventional diagnostic workup

Quality of life · people with unexplained recurrent syncope

1 finding from 1 review

Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic workup for unexplained recurrent syncope 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 279 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Implantable loop recorder vs conventional diagnostic workup

Syncope relapse · people with unexplained recurrent syncope

1 finding from 1 review

Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic workup for unexplained recurrent syncope 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 507 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Implantable loop recorder vs conventional diagnostic workup

Costs · people with unexplained recurrent syncope

1 finding from 1 review

Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic workup for unexplained recurrent syncope 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 261 participants
GRADE not reported

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Implantable loop recorder vs conventional diagnostic workup

Aetiologic diagnosis · people with unexplained recurrent syncope

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Implantable loop recorder probably leads to lower aetiologic diagnosis compared with conventional diagnostic workup (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic workup for unexplained recurrent syncope 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.61 [0.54, 0.68]
4 studies · 579 participants
Moderate