Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

12 questions · 12 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 5 · 41.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 25%Moderate 4 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal lorazepam vs intramuscular paraldehyde

Additional drugs required to terminate the seizure: 2 or more additional anticonvulsants required · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal lorazepam may leads to lower additional drugs required to terminate the seizure: 2 or more… compared with intramuscular paraldehyde (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal lorazepam vs intramuscular paraldehyde

Seizure recurrence within 24 hours · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal lorazepam showed no clear difference in seizure recurrence within 24 hours compared with intramuscular paraldehyde (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal lorazepam vs intramuscular paraldehyde

Seizure cessation: within 10 minutes · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intranasal lorazepam showed no clear difference in seizure cessation: within 10 minutes compared with intramuscular paraldehyde (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam vs intranasal lorazepam

Seizure cessation: within 10 minutes · Children with acute tonic‐clonic seizures

Summary of findings ‐ Intravenous lorazepam showed no clear difference in seizure cessation: within 10 minutes compared with intranasal lorazepam (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review