Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

32 questions · 32 findings · 2 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 3.1%Low 10 · 31.3%Moderate 21 · 65.6%High 0 · 0%

Steroid implant vs sham

Proportion of participants with recurrence of uveitis · people with chronic non‐infectious uveitis

Steroid implant may leads to lower proportion of participants with recurrence of uveitis compared with sham procedure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Steroid implant vs sham

Proportion of eyes with cataract formation or progression, or surgery · people with chronic non‐infectious uveitis

Steroid implant may leads to higher proportion of participants with cataract formation/progression, or… compared with sham procedure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Steroid implant vs sham

Proportion of participants with elevated IOP or receiving intervention · people with chronic non‐infectious uveitis

Steroid implant probably leads to higher proportion of participants with elevated IOP or receiving intervention compared with sham procedure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Steroid implant vs sham

Proportion of participants with endophthalmitis · people with chronic non‐infectious uveitis

Steroid implant showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with endophthalmitis compared with sham procedure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Steroid implant vs sham

Proportion of participants with retinal tear or detachment · people with chronic non‐infectious uveitis

Steroid implant showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with retinal tear or detachment compared with sham procedure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review