Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

37 questions · 37 findings · 4 reviews · Incontinence · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 16 · 43.2%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 8 · 21.6%Low 8 · 21.6%Moderate 3 · 8.1%High 2 · 5.4%

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether single‐incision slings changes number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: at 12 months · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: 12 months compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Patient‐reported pain: at more than 24 months · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings probably leads to lower patient‐reported pain: at more than 24 months compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings leads to lower number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs autologous fascial slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with autologous fascial slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: at 12 months · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: at 12 months compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review