Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

21 questions · 21 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 8 · 38.1%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 4.8%Low 7 · 33.3%Moderate 3 · 14.3%High 2 · 9.5%

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether single‐incision slings changes number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: at 12 months · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: 12 months compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Patient‐reported pain: at more than 24 months · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings probably leads to lower patient‐reported pain: at more than 24 months compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings leads to lower number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs transobturator minimally‐invasive slings

Number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women requiring repeat continence surgery or mesh revision compared with transobturator minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs autologous fascial slings

Number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in number of women with mesh exposure, extrusion or erosion in any area compared with autologous fascial slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single‐incision slings vs retropubic minimally‐invasive slings

Subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: at 12 months · women with urinary incontinence

Single‐incision slings showed no clear difference in subjective cure or improvement of urinary incontinence: at 12 months compared with retropubic minimally‐invasive slings (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review