Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) · Completely edentulous people
It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) compared with two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of border adjustments and sore spots after insertion of denture · Completely edentulous people
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Not measured
0 studies
No studies found
Operator-assessed quality of the denture · Completely edentulous people
1 finding from 1 review
Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) · Completely edentulous people
It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction,… compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Oral health-related quality of life · Completely edentulous people
It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT) compared with two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Mandibular denture satisfaction · Completely edentulous people
It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes mandibular denture satisfaction compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Maxillary denture satisfaction · Completely edentulous people
It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes maxillary denture satisfaction compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Oral health-related quality of life · Completely edentulous people
It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT) compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Operator-assessed quality of the denture (retention and stability) · Completely edentulous people
1 finding from 1 review
Model discrimination (area under the ROC curve, AUC) · Children and adolescents aged 1-18 years
Simplified childhood caries prediction models show moderate pooled discrimination (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.73-0.84) but with very high heterogeneity (I2=97.3%) and all models at high risk of bias (PROBAST); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Poor (inadequate) oral hygiene (prevalence) · Children or adolescents
No significant difference in oral hygiene between CLWH on ART and healthy controls (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.07; single study).
1 finding from 1 review
Gingival inflammation-related index · Adolescents/teenagers undergoing orthodontic treatment
A single study reported lower simplified gingival index with aligners versus fixed appliances in adolescents at 1 month (MD -8.46, 95% CI -10.47 to -6.45; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
MD -8.46 [-10.47, -6.45]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Plaque · Adolescents/teenagers undergoing orthodontic treatment
A single study reported lower simplified plaque index with aligners versus fixed appliances in adolescents at 1 month (MD -14.78, 95% CI -16.74 to -12.82; ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review