Self‐monitoring of oral anticoagulation vs usual care
Self‐monitoring of oral anticoagulation probably leads to lower thromboembolic events compared with standard care (moderate certainty).
- RR 0.69 [0.49, 0.97]7 studies · 4097 participantsModerate
Self‐monitoring of oral anticoagulation probably leads to lower thromboembolic events compared with standard care (moderate certainty).
Self‐monitoring of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with standard care (moderate certainty).
Self‐monitoring of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in major haemorrhage compared with standard care (low certainty).
Self‐monitoring of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in minor haemorrhage compared with standard care (moderate certainty).
Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation probably leads to lower thromboembolic events compared with standard care (moderate certainty).
Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with standard care (moderate certainty).
Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in major haemorrhage compared with standard care (moderate certainty).
Self‐monitoring or self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in minor haemorrhage compared with standard care (low certainty).
self‐management of oral anticoagulation probably leads to lower all‐cause mortality compared with standard care (moderate certainty).
self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in major haemorrhage compared with standard care (low certainty).
self‐management of oral anticoagulation showed no clear difference in minor haemorrhage compared with standard care (low certainty).
self‐management of oral anticoagulation probably leads to lower thromboembolic events compared with standard care (moderate certainty).