Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma · All outcomes

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Selective caries removal (SCR) + composite resin vs Complete caries removal (CCR) + composite resin

Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth after vital or non-vital pulp therapy

In one RCT, selective caries removal had a 3.44 higher probability of failure than complete caries removal.

1 finding from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth:… 2022 All outcomes
2 to 3 years · University, Brazil
Relative probability of failure 3.44
1 study · 48 participants
GRADE not reported

Selective caries removal (SCR) + composite resin vs Complete caries removal (CCR) + composite resin

Treatment failure (annual failure rate) · Children with deep dentine caries in primary molars restored with composite resin (indirect pulp treatment; pulpotomy only if pulp exposed…

Complete caries removal with composite resin had an annual failure rate of 6.8% in primary molars (single high-risk-of-bias RCT; low quality of evidence; not GRADE-rated).

2 findings from 1 review

Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth:… 2022 All outcomes
36 months · University, Brazil (Liberman et al. 2020 / Franzon et al. 2015) · Complete caries removal (CCR) arm
AFR 6.8
1 study · 48 participants
GRADE not reported
Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated primary teeth:… 2022 All outcomes
36 months · University, Brazil (Liberman et al. 2020 / Franzon et al. 2015) · Selective caries removal (SCR) arm
AFR 17.1
1 study · 48 participants
GRADE not reported