evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

8 questions · 8 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 5 · 62.5%Very low 0 · 0%Low 3 · 37.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Process outcome, Practitioner Impact 5. Staff did not provide psychological interventions (as suggested by the guideline) · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

Re‐written guideline text showed no clear difference in process outcome, Practitioner Impact 5. Staff did not provide… compared with original guideline text (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Process outcome, Practitioner Impact 3. Staff not trained (as suggested by the guideline) · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

Re‐written guideline text showed no clear difference in process outcome, Practitioner Impact 3. Staff not trained (as… compared with original guideline text (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Re‐written guideline text vs original guideline text

Process outcome, Practitioner Impact 4. Staff not supervised (as suggested by the guideline) · patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses

Re‐written guideline text showed no clear difference in process outcome, Practitioner Impact 4. Staff not supervised (as… compared with original guideline text (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review